Chapter One             Introduction

 

 


Introduction

 

Sharptown’s Comprehensive Plan looks at potential growth within the Town through the year 2030.  Infrastructure, housing, growth and many other issues are discussed within this plan.  The main purpose of this plan is to properly prepare for growth and other issues that the Town will encounter over the next twenty years.

 

Acknowledgements

 

The Town would like to thank Tracey Gordy and Keith Lackie with the Maryland Department of Planning Lower Eastern Shore Regional Office for assisting the Town in finding grant funding and for providing technical assistance at no cost to the Town.  The Town would also like to acknowledge Davis, Bowen & Friedel, Inc.’s planning and engineering staff for assisting in preparing the Town’s future growth plan and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for providing financial assistance for this project. 

 

Legal Basis for Planning in Maryland

 

Article 66B of the Annotated Code of Maryland requires municipalities that maintain zoning authority over the jurisdiction to develop a comprehensive plan.  Article 66B also requires municipalities to address specific issues within their growth plans.  2006 House Bill 1141 further requires municipalities to address the impact projected growth will have on infrastructure, water resources, schools, libraries and public safety.  Sharptown’s Comprehensive Growth Plan meets the necessary requirements under Article 66B and House Bill 1141, and further addresses housing in order to be able to participate in the Workforce Housing Grant Program developed under House Bill 1160.

 

The information below further discusses Maryland’s visions and requirements for growth as they relate to Sharptown.

 

The State’s Eight Visions for Guiding Future Growth

 

The following eight “vision statements” are based on the 1992 Planning Act, and subsequent amendments thereto, and are incorporated into this Comprehensive Plan as fundamental goals which will be achieved through a variety of objectives, policies, principles, recommendations, and implementation techniques.

 

(1)               The Town will concentrate development in suitable areas. Further, the Town will coordinate its planning activities with the County to establish a mutually agreed-upon Town Growth Boundary (TGB) to accommodate future municipal growth.

 

(2)               The Town will protect its sensitive areas from the adverse effects of development and the improper management of resource lands.  The TGB will avoid sensitive areas, or protect them as public open space, or protect them with innovative and flexible development regulations.

 

(3)               The Town will work cooperatively with the County to encourage it to protect rural resources beyond the TGB that affect the environment, setting, character, and economics of the Town.

 

(4)               The Town will promote stewardship of the Chesapeake Bay and the land and will encourage a universal stewardship ethic that guides actions of both the public and private sectors.  Stewardship principles will also guide preparation of land use regulations and capital programs, and be promoted through incentives and community volunteerism.

 

(5)               The Town will conserve its land, water, and other valuable resources through programs and policies that will reduce resource consumption by both the public and private sectors. The Town will promote efficient and pedestrian-oriented patterns of land use, energy saving measures for residences and businesses, and recycling.

 

(6)               In order to achieve Visions One through Five, above, the Town will encourage economic growth through the policies and recommendations of the Plan, and will practice regulatory innovation, flexibility, and streamlining.       

 

(7)               The Town will make certain that adequate public facilities and infrastructure under its control are available or planned in areas where growth is to occur.

 

(8)               The Town will address funding mechanisms to achieve the preceding Visions.  The Town budget, capital improvement program, tax structure, and fees will be reviewed and revised where needed to ensure implementation of the Plan and to promote the community’s vision for the future.  The Town will pursue appropriate State and federal grants, forge grant partnerships with the County in areas of mutual interest, review Town capital projects to ensure consistency with the Plan, and encourage State and County capital projects that support the Plan.

 

1997 Priority Funding Areas Act

 

The 1997 Priority Funding Areas Act capitalizes on the influence of State expenditures on economic growth and development. This legislation directs State spending to Priority Funding Areas. Priority Funding Areas are existing communities and places where local governments want State investment to support future growth.

Growth-related projects covered by the legislation include most State programs that encourage or support growth and development such as highways, sewer and water construction, economic development assistance, and State leases or construction of new office facilities.

The Priority Funding Areas legislation builds on the foundation created by the Visions that were adopted as State policy in the 1992 Economic Growth, Resource Protection and Planning Act and are articulated above as fundamental goals for the Town of Sharptown. Beginning October 1, 1998, the State of Maryland directed funding for projects that support growth to Priority Funding Areas. Funding for projects in municipalities, other existing communities, industrial areas, and planned growth areas designated by counties receive priority State funding over other projects. Priority Funding Areas are locations where the State and local governments want to target their efforts to encourage and support economic development and new growth.

Sharptown’s municipal boundary, as it existed on January 1, 1997, is considered a pre-defined Priority Funding Area, and as such enjoys a priority for State funding for growth-related projects.  For those lands annexed after January 1, 1997, Sharptown must seek State concurrence of Local certification of Priority Funding Area designation.  Factors considered by the State include: provision of public water and sewer, site location within a locally designated growth area of the adopted Comprehensive Plan, as well as permitted density by zoning category and a supply/demand analysis.

The Smart Growth Initiative

 

In addition to the Priority Funding Areas Act, the 1997 General Assembly passed four other pieces of legislation and budget initiatives - Brownfields, Live Near Your Work, Job Creation Tax Credits, and Rural Legacy-known collectively as "Smart Growth."

Smart Growth directs the State to target programs and funding to support established communities and locally designated growth areas, and to protect rural areas. The Priority Funding Areas Act provides a geographic focus for the State's investment in growth-related infrastructure. The remaining four components complement this geographic focus by targeting specific State resources to preserve land outside of Priority Funding Areas, to encourage growth inside Priority Funding Areas, and to ensure that existing communities continue to provide a high quality of life for their residents.

Maryland has adopted the following principles of Smart Growth, which provide guidance for new development, infill development, and redevelopment:

·         Mix land uses;

·         Take advantage of compact building design;

·         Create housing opportunities and choices;

·         Create walkable communities;

·         Foster distinctive, attractive communities with a strong sense of place;

·         Preserve open space, farmland, natural beauty, and critical environmental areas;

·         Provide a variety of transportation options;

·         Strengthen and direct development to existing communities;

·         Make development decisions predictable, fair, and cost effective; and

·         Encourage community and stakeholder collaboration in development decisions.

Although the 1997 Smart Growth initiative was significant in the State's refusal to fund wasteful sprawl development, it is also only one component in the continuum of Maryland's growth policy development.

House Bill 1141 (Enacted during 2006 Legislative Session)

 

During the 2006 Maryland Legislative Session, House Bill 1141 was enacted.  This is a key planning related law having a direct effect on procedures for annexation and requiring new planning elements within Sharptown’s Comprehensive Plan.

 

 

 

Annexation Procedures

 

There are two significant changes, with respect to annexation procedures, which affect the Town.  The first change is dealing with “the five year rule” and the second change deals with “annexation plans”

The Five Year Rule

 

There are two changes here. First, the rule would be applied solely based upon zoning. In the past, the five-year rule could be applied whenever a proposed new zoning classification was substantially different from the use envisioned "in the current and duly adopted master plan." The reference to the master plan is now gone and the issue becomes the degree of change from the current county zoning classification to the proposed municipal classification following the annexation. When the zoning change is from one residential zone to another," substantially different" now is defined as a density change. The five-year rule will not kick in for a density change unless the proposed zoning is 50% denser. For example, if the current zoning permits 1 unit per acre, the new zoning can be subject to the five year rule if it permits anything more than 1.5 units per acre. As before, a municipality may obtain a waiver from the county to avoid the five-year wait until the new zoning classification applies.  This change took effect on October 1, 2006.

Annexation Plans

 

An annexation plan is required that replaces the "outline" for the extension of services and public facilities prior to the public hearing for an annexation proposal. This section contains no additional language for the content of the annexation plan to be adopted, but does require it to be consistent with the municipal growth element for any annexations that begin after October 1, 2009 (unless extended for up to two six-month periods). The Plan must be provided to the county and the State (the Maryland Department of Planning) at least 30 days prior to the hearing. The requirement for an annexation plan and the requirement that it be provided to the Maryland Department of Planning took effect on October 1, 2006. The requirement for consistency with the Municipal Growth Element of the comprehensive plan takes effect no later than October 1, 2009.

 

New Planning Elements

 

The new legislation mentioned above requires two new elements (i.e., chapters) of local comprehensive plans. The first element, the Water Resources Plan Element - is required of all local governments (county and municipal) that exercise planning and zoning authority. The second element, the Municipal Growth Element - is required in municipal comprehensive plans only. Both elements are required to be incorporated into the Town’s Comprehensive Plan not later than October 1, 2009 (unless extended for up to two six-month periods).

The Water Resources Plan Element

 

This new planning element addresses the relationship of planned growth to water resources for both waste disposal and safe drinking water. It will be required of all county and municipal governments in the State. The element must identify drinking water and other water resources adequate for the needs of existing and future development proposed in the land use element of the comprehensive plan. It must also identify suitable receiving waters for both wastewater and storm water management to meet the needs of existing and projected development proposed in the land use element of the comprehensive plan. The Maryland Department of the Environment will provide available data to identify these resources. Resource issues expected to be addressed in these elements include water resource protection areas, groundwater resources, water quality standards and Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs).

The Municipal Growth Element

 

This element requires a municipality to identify areas for future growth consistent with a long-range vision for its future. The growth element will be developed based on consideration of a comprehensive list of factors including population projections, an assessment of land capacity and needs and an assessment of infrastructure and sensitive areas. Completion of the element will guide future annexation proposals and plans after October 2009. Consultation with Wicomico County is required, and a joint planning agreement with the county is encouraged.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE WAS LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Chapter Two            Sharptown’s Past and Future Vision

 

 


Location

 

Sharptown is an incorporated community of approximately 680 residents[*]. It lies in the northwestern tip of Wicomico County along the Nanticoke River approximately two miles from the Delaware State line.  Direct access is provided to Dorchester County, Maryland via Maryland Route 313 - Sharptown Bypass. The nearest urban centers are Laurel and Seaford, Delaware (approximately eight and twelve miles, respectively), and Salisbury, Maryland which is approximately 17 miles from Sharptown.  Access to Salisbury is provided by Maryland Route 313, Maryland Route 54 and U.S. Route 50.  A map showing the location of Sharptown is located on the following page.

 

History

 

When America declared its independence from Great Britain in 1776, Sharptown was little more than a hamlet on the southern bank of the Nanticoke River.  Although the Town's origin is uncertain, the discovery of thousands of spear and arrow heads in the area proves that it was inhabited by Native Americans.  The area was the first high and dry building site on the south side of the river from its mouth, almost 32 miles distant.  Some sources indicate it was recognized as a settlement about 1769.

 

By the very early 1800's however, it was known as Sharptown.  Speculation has it that the village was named after Governor Horatio Sharpe, proprietary Governor of Maryland from 1753 to 1769.  Although the Governor never seemed to mention this honor in his personal letters or papers, he was in that area in June 1761 to observe the work of a group of surveyors involved in the preliminary Delaware boundary dispute.

 

Three years after the Governor's visit, the famous surveying team of Charles Mason and Jeremiah Dixon crossed the Nanticoke in canoes, making their way south toward the Middle Point, and landed at Twiford's Wharf where they pitched their tents.  On an earlier visit in June they had hired ax men from the local populace who were still part of their crew.  Throughout the next few weeks they continued to work in the neighborhood, keeping their "headquarters" at Twiford's.  They left the last part of September of 1764.

 

Gravestones from the 1700's bear names of many families still living in the town - Bennett, Phillips, Elzey, Robinson, Gravenor, Dashiell and Collins. Around 1818, the Matthew Marine family settled there.  Matthew Marine's ancestors had been among Maryland's first settlers.  They were of French Huguenot stock and in the 1600's spelled their name Merine or Merin.  His grandfather had been in Somerset County in 1736 but later moved to Dorchester, and it was from there that Matthew and his wife Nancy Rawlings came to Sharptown.  The Nanticoke River


family settled there.  Matthew Marine's ancestors had been among Maryland's first settlers.  They were of French Huguenot stock and in the 1600's spelled their name Merine or Merin.  His grandfather had been in Somerset County in 1736 but later moved to Dorchester, and it was

 

Figure 2‑1

Location Map

 

 
 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

proved to be more than a navigable river to use for transportation; it was the basis for an industry that would carry the town's name across the oceans.

 

As the founder of the Sharptown Marine Railway, Marine owned the largest fleet of schooners of any one person on the Nanticoke that ran from Sharptown to Baltimore. He also became a financier, philanthropist, a banker and "man of public affairs."  He died in 1854. 

 

His son, the Rev. Fletcher Marine, was in business with his father for a while, but later moved to Vienna and on to Baltimore where he served as a minister until his death in 1889.  The Reverend Fletcher Marine's son, William, was appointed a collector of the port of Baltimore by President Benjamin Harrison.

 

Some of the better known ships built by the railway between 1865 and 1893 included the “Martha Ellen”, the “Nettie R. Evans”, the “James H. Hargrave” and the “John W. Elliott”.  At the turn of the century, 18 sailing vessels registered as U.S. merchant ships had been built in Sharptown.  They ranged in gross tonnage from 9.43 to 215.5 tons.  The last large sailing vessel built on the Chesapeake Bay was the four-masted “Anandale” constructed there in 1919.  Some steamships were built at Sharptown, such as the “George W. Johnson” in 1883, but the shipyard's prime product was always the sailing vessel.

 

Text Box: The schooner shown here is one of many built or repaired during Sharptown’s booming shipbuilding industry in the late 1800s.

Source:  Sharptown Historical Commission
The first steamboat to come by Sharptown on the way to Seaford was the “Osiris” in 1854, followed by the Kent in 1855.  From 1860 to 1885, several companies including the Old Bay Line and the Tolchester Company, attempted to establish steamboat lines on the Nanticoke River, but they usually proved unsuccessful.  Then the Nanticoke Transportation Line put the “W. E. Clarke” in service, later renamed “Nanticoke”, in 1883.  That same year the Nanticoke Steam Boat Company put the side-wheeler “Chowan” on the river.  The same run was made by the chartered “Conoho” of the Choptank Steamboat Company.  Both companies made three trips a week-between Baltimore and the towns on the Nanticoke.  By 1899, the “Chowan”, also renamed the “Nanticoke” by her new owners, the Baltimore Chesapeake and Atlantic Railway Company, could offer passengers their choice of fourteen state rooms equipped with electric lights.  Freight shipped from Baltimore via a steamer was often transferred to smaller steamers at Sharptown and then sent to other Eastern Shore towns.

 

In the early part of the 1800's, the prosperity in the Town attracted many new settlers.  By 1845, there were enough residents to warrant the establishment of a post office.  Nine years later, Somerset County made the area its thirteenth election district.  When Wicomico County was created in 1867, it became District 10.

 

Religion has always played an important part in the lives of the town's people.  A Methodist Episcopal church had been built outside of the town in 1832, but in those days it was just too far to travel.  Instead the Methodist Protestant church in nearby Portsville, Delaware, had started sponsoring services in the homes of families in Sharptown.  The Phillips and Cooper families especially were instrumental in having the Harmony Methodist Protestant church built in town in 1845.  In 1885, the members, under the leadership on Rev. G. R. McCready, built a new church on a lot on the corner of Railway and Church Streets.  A Methodist Episcopal church, meanwhile, had been constructed in town in 1876.

 

During the Civil War, there was little enthusiasm for either the North or South in Sharptown.  Although a Union regiment was formed, based in Salisbury, they disbanded when ordered to cross the Chesapeake Bay.  Few men joined the Confederate side.

 

By 1877, the town could boast of four dry goods stores owned by John Smith, Thomas J. Twilley, J.R. Twilley, and S. T. Cooper.  There was also a basket company located in Sharptown at this time which had been established by John Robinson and his brother.  They manufactured grape and peach baskets, desk plugs, trunnel wedges, wood and iron turning, and fruit crates and baskets.  There was a blacksmith/shipsmith shop (owned by Edward Burford), two ship carpenter/smith shops (owned by John W. Robinson and W.I.J. Phillips), and a ship carpenter/sail maker, C. J. Gravenor.  Wesley Clarkson owned a thriving business in groceries and whiskey by the wharf.  The Sharptown Marine Railway Company was in operation, now owned by R. M. Elzey and Brothers.  Dr. Joseph Mann cured the town's ills.  Joshua P. Bennett and Richard Darby served as Justices of the Peace in the district, while James F. Marine was Officer of Registration for elections.

 

The Town was first incorporated in 1874 but that was repealed in 1880, only to be incorporated again eight years later (1888) in a manner identical to that of the Act of 1874.  An unusual feature of that Act was that it allowed Town Commissioners to alter town boundaries.  The entire charter was again repealed and reenacted in 1912.

 

For several years after World War I, business declined due to the loss of the railway.  Robinson sold his growing basket-making business to Marvel Package Company and with that as the main employer, the Town provided jobs for approximately 200 of its own residents.  The population was maintained at 600 to 700 for most of the years after 1920.  Marvel Package Company later sold to Atlas Plywood Company.  After the factory was destroyed by fire in 1953, they decided not to rebuild it and Sharptown's bustling business days came to an end.

 

Text Box: Sharptown’s commercial sector greatly declined after the fire destroying the Marvel Package Company occurred.

Source:  Sharptown Historical Commission
To present day, the character of Sharptown has not changed much from its shipbuilding and industrial days.  With the exception of a national concern over removing toxic chemicals from an old oil company site, Sharptown has flown under the radar for the past 50 years. 

 


Community Participation

 

In order to develop a vision for the Town’s future, direct input from residents and businesses of the Town was sought out.  In Fall 2007, the President and Town Commissioners and the Planning Commission met separately to discuss whether the previous vision, goals and objectives listed in the 1996 Comprehensive Plan were still valid and discussed changes to the vision, goals and objectives that should be added in this update.

 

Later in Fall 2007, the Town conducted a Comprehensive Planning workshop.  All of the residents and businesses in Sharptown were invited to participate in the input and visioning process.  All members in attendance were informed of the comprehensive planning process and the State guidelines for developing a comprehensive plan.  The larger group was separated into smaller “breakout” groups and asked to brainstorm about various issues, including future growth, the character of the community and services provided to the Town.  The groups input was compiled and used to further develop the vision for this Plan.

 

The Town further sought out alternative methods of gaining community input throughout this planning process.  Anonymous surveys and comment forms were distributed door-to-door to members of the community.  Surveys and discussion boards were also made available via an internet website in order to gain a greater response from a larger sample area.  Survey results and questionnaires were analyzed and incorporated into the vision for the Town.

 

The individual plan elements in draft form were provided at Town Hall and on the internet for review and comment by Town residents.  Two public hearings were held, by the Planning Commission and Town Council, where additional feedback was provided.  All comments were incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan where applicable.[†]

Resident Survey Results

 

Town residents were provided a survey door-to-door and on the internet.  The survey asked residents to respond to a number of questions, including their satisfaction with Town facilities and their feelings about expanding Town boundaries to coordinate growth.  Out of the nearly 300 households and 680 residents, the Town received an 18% and 7.5% rate of response, respectively. 

 

Future Vision

 

Text Box: Interesting Fact:

54% of residents who responded to the Town’s survey stated they were not interested in expanding the Town’s boundaries.
After receiving input from the community, as described above, and reviewing the Town’s vision for the future as stated in the 1996 Comprehensive Plan, the character and vision for the community remains virtually unchanged.  Sharptown would like to remain a small, tight-knit, “bedroom” community.  The Town prides itself on remaining a personable residential community and maintaining the character of the Town while recognizing and managing inevitable future growth. 

 

The residents of Sharptown realize their community is growing slowly but will continue to grow.  The Town understands young families need to be welcomed into Sharptown as residents and neighbors to the existing community in order to maintain the Town’s vitality.  Residents also recognize it has a strong and growing retirement population that is fundamental to the fabric of the community.  In order to keep the close community together as times change, it is important to the residents of Sharptown that its borders remain small and the community does not expand to the point where the Town loses its character mainstay.

 

The future of the Town must maintain and carry on the story of its historical roots.  Residents and businesses recognize the rich history and historical resources of the Town.  Main Street consists of a mix of residences and small businesses which provide important services to members of the community within close proximity of their homes.  The downtown business community also must be able to thrive in providing quality services to the locals.

 

Sharptown must also create a business environment that allows for the development of additional services within Town so residents do not have to travel long distances for essential needs (e.g., food, medical care, senior services).  The Town further notes any business expansion must be sustainable – meaning it will need to be in scale and character to be supported economically by the residents and businesses in Sharptown.  Moreover, business development that is incompatible with the Main Street Community should be developed along the highway corridor in order to maintain the historic areas.

 

The Town has the luxury of many different parks of varying sizes and the use of the Nanticoke River.  Residents recognize in order to maintain these gems that parks and recreation must be utilized and supported by a broad range of residents within Sharptown and the outside community.  The community’s parks help Sharptown maintain its rural character and also provide an environment for providing healthy recreation. 

 

Residents also realize that Sharptown is a small part of a much larger community on the Eastern Shore sharing vital water resources.  The residents’ vision is to protect vital resources by endorsing a growth pattern that leads to the least impact on water supply and the Nanticoke River.  Development must occur in a manner that recognizes the “big picture” problems that occur with a lack of infrastructure, resources and sprawl.

 

In closing, the vision for the community is simple:  maintain the character and quality of life in the community, provide services to the Town’s residents and create an environment that allows for controlled growth while introducing new families into the fabric of Sharptown. 

 

Goals and Objectives

 

The following goals and objectives are guided by the State’s eight visions and the community’s visioning and participation. 

 

  1. Maintain the rural character of community;
  2. Recognize and protect the Town’s historic resources;
  3. Encourage infill growth where possible;
  4. Discourage sprawl;
  5. Ensure housing is available and affordable to all members of the community;
  6. Encourage commercial and economic growth that can be sustained by the Sharptown community and does not affect Main Street businesses;
  7. Protect and preserve Sharptown parks and recreational facilities;
  8. Protect the Nanticoke River and its resources, and prohibit environmentally hazardous development within the Chesapeake Bay Critical Area;
  9. Create a future growth pattern that has the least impact on vital water resources and community infrastructure;
  10. Improve transportation patterns and street infrastructure to meet the current and future needs of the community;
  11. Ensure Town resources are not diminished beyond standards set in this plan concerning future growth;
  12. Work along side of property owners and developers to mitigate future impacts and meet the needs of the Town;
  13. Develop mechanisms to implement the broad-based goals of the community;
  14. Ensure funding mechanisms exist or are planned for as part of the implementation process.

 

Conclusions

 

Sharptown is a beautiful hamlet community in Wicomico County.  The Town looks forward to the challenge of maintaining its current character, while adapting to future growth and other growth challenges.  This plan is being developed to guide the visions of the community for future generations of residents and public officers.  In 2030, Sharptown plans to remain a small, personable community that is more improved by implementing this plan.

 

Implementation and funding is important to make sure this plan is more than just a plan, but a mechanism for guiding the future of the Town.  The policies that are drawn from this plan are as equally important as the future vision for the Town and the goals and objectives discussed herein.  A Comprehensive Plan is a living, breathing document.  The Town should revisit the plan from time-to-time to see which goals have been met, where shortfalls remain and to address the new goals of the community. 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE WAS LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK

 

 


Chapter Three  Sharptown Today – Social, Economic and Housing Characteristics

 

 


Population and Demographics

Population Trends

 

The Town of Sharptown has experienced periodic increases and decreases in population throughout the decades, showing a 31 person (4.6%) net decrease in population from 1950 to 2000.  In the years from 1960 to 1970 and 1990 to 2000, Sharptown’s population increased by 40 persons.  In the years from 1950 to 1960, 1970 to 1980, and 1980 to 1990 the town experienced a decrease in population of 60, 6, and 45 persons, respectively.  Sharptown is currently experiencing a period of increasing population as of 2000 (See Figure 3-1 below).

 

Figure 31

Source: MD Office of Planning, Planning Data Services & 2000 Census

 

The 2000 Census population of Sharptown is 649 persons, 40 persons (6.6%) above the 1990 Census count of 609.  Prior to 1990 there was a 51 person (7.7%) decrease in population since 1970.  Note that Sharptown conforms to the trend of increasing population among Wicomico County municipalities from 1990 to 2000; however, since 1970 Sharptown is the only municipality to experience a net loss of population.  Wicomico County and the State of Maryland both have experienced population growth according to every Census since 1950 (See Table 3 - 1)

 

Sharptown accounts for a small portion of Wicomico County’s total population.  In 1970, it accounted for 1.22% of the county total.  By 1980 it decreased to 1.01%, by 1990 to 0.82% and by 2000 to 0.77%.  These decreasing proportions are reflective of Sharptown’s primarily static population compared to the more rapidly increasing population of Wicomico County, which has increased in population 56.1% since 1970. 

 

Table 31

Total Population

Place

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

Delmar

1,328

1,291

1,191

1,232

1,430

1,859

Fruitland

1,028

1,147

2,315

2,694

3,511

3,774

Hebron

723

754

705

714

665

807

Mardela Springs

428

380

356

320

360

364

Pittsville

497

488

477

519

602

1,182

Salisbury

15,141

16,302

15,252

16,429

20,592

23,743

Sharptown

680

620

660

654

609

649

Willards

464

531

494

540

708

938

Wicomico County

39,641

49,641

54,236

64,540

74,339

84,644

State of Maryland

2.3 M

3.1 M

3.92 M

4.22 M

4.78 M

5.29 M

Source: MD Office of Planning, Planning Data Services & 2000 Census

Age Composition

 

Text Box: Interesting Fact:

Sharptown is the only municipality in Wicomico County with a net loss in population since 1970.
The age structure and total population trends are important components of future land use designations for Sharptown’s future needs.  Programmers of policies for community facilities, such as schools or services, and providing transportation for persons with limited mobility, rely on age composition data.  In addition, key indicators of relative well being, such as employment and housing, are also dependent upon the age structure of the population (See Table 3-2). In comparison to the State, the County, and other municipalities in Wicomico County, Sharptown consists of a smaller proportion of children less than 5 years of age.  Sharptown also has a smaller proportion of population from 18 to 24.  Persons 18 to 24 years old are generally the most mobile population group.  The lower proportion of 18 to 24 year olds is most likely reflective of those individuals leaving Sharptown after completing high school to enter the civilian labor force, go away to college, or join the military. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 32

 

Table 32

Age Cohort by Municipality

City/Town

<5

5-17

18-24

25-44

45-64

65+

Median Age

Delmar (1,859)

8.4%

23.1%

9.8%

30.1%

18.6%

10.0%

31.7

Fruitland (3,774)

7.4%

20.8%

9.4%

30.0%

20.5%

11.9%

34.3

Hebron (807)

7.1%

23.4%

8.4%

30.4%

20.1%

10.7%

32.2

Mardela Springs (364)

6.3%

22.8%

8.2%

30.2%

20.6%

11.8%

34.3

Pittsville (1,182)

8.6%

18.2%

9.6%

34.1%

20.5%

9.0%

32.2

Salisbury (23,743)

6.2%

15.6%

21.8%

26.9%

17.0%

12.5%

29.4

Sharptown (649)

4.9%

20.4%

5.2%

31.1%

21.9%

16.5%

37.9

Willards (938)

8.6%

20.4%

9.4%

32.0%

17.5%

12.2%

32.4

Wicomico County (84,644)

6.3%

18.5%

11.8%

28.0%

22.6%

12.8%

35.8

State of Maryland (5,296,486)

6.7%

18.9%

8.5%

31.4%

23.1%

11.3%

36.0

Source: 2000 Census

 

The ratio of persons in the 25 to 44 year old age group for Sharptown is 31.1%, higher than Wicomico County at 28.0% and slightly lower than the State of Maryland at 31.4%.

 

The median age of Sharptown is higher than all other municipalities in Wicomico County, as well as Wicomico County as a whole and the State of Maryland.  In 2000, the median age of the people residing in Wicomico County was 35.8 years, while the median age of the residents of Sharptown was 37.9 years of age; 2.1 years higher than that of the county (See Figure 3-2).  While the median age difference is not that drastic between Sharptown and Wicomico County, Sharptown’s median age is 8.5 years higher than that of Salisbury, the municipality with the lowest median age. 

Text Box: Interesting Fact:

Sharptown has the largest proportion of 65 and over residents in the County and the oldest average age for all residents.

The 45 to 64 year old group comprises 21.9% of the total population in Sharptown.  While this is the highest share for this age group of any other municipality in Wicomico County (ranging from 17.0% in Salisbury to 20.6% in Mardela), the difference is minimal.  For the County and State, the percentage of this age group to total population are 22.6% and 23.1%, respectively, both of which are greater than Sharptown’s proportion in this age group.

 

Persons 65 years old and over comprise 16.5% of Sharptown’s population, compared to 12.8% for the County and 11.3% for the State.  In other municipalities, this age group ranges from 9.0% in Pittsville to 12.2% in Willards.  When this age group is coupled with the grouping of persons 45 to 64 years, persons 45 years and older accounted for 38.4% of Sharptown’s population.  In Wicomico County, the two age groups accounted for 35.4% of the total population and 34.4% Statewide.  In other municipalities of the County, the range is from 29.5% in Salisbury and Pittsville and 32.4% in Mardela Springs and Fruitland (See Table 3-2). 

Gender and Racial Composition

 

In the 2000 Census, Sharptown’s population was 46.8% male and 53.2% female.  This closely mirrors the gender characteristics of Maryland and Wicomico County (See Figure 3-3).  Sharptown exists as a dominantly white community with 94.9% of its population being white.  Sharptown considerably lacks the racial diversity that exists in Wicomico County and the State of Maryland (See Figure 3-4). 

 

Figure 33

Text Box: Percentage of Population

Figure 34

 

 

 

Education and Employment

Education

 

The majority of Sharptown’s persons 3 years and older are enrolled in elementary schools (grades 1-8) which are generally 6 to 14 year old children.  The proportion of elementary age children is considerably higher than that of Wicomico County and Maryland.  In contrast, the proportion of persons enrolled in college or graduate school is 8.6%, considerably less than that of Wicomico County and Maryland.  Sharptown has a higher percentage of high school graduates, but a lower percent of persons with degrees of higher education than the County, but a lower percentage than the State (See Table 3-3). 

 

Table 33

Educational Statistics

 

Sharptown

Wicomico

Maryland

Persons 3 years or older enrolled in school

175

24,554

1,475,484

Nursery school, preschool

1.7%

5.4%

6.5%

Kindergarten

5.1%

4.3%

5.1%

Elementary school (grades 1-8)

66.3%

41.0%

43.5%

High school (grades 9-12)

18.3%

19.8%

20.9%

College or graduate school

8.6%

29.5%

24.0%

 

 

 

 

Educational Attainment: Persons 25 years and over

429

53,521

3,495,595

Less than 9th grade

4.4%

6.0%

5.1%

9th-12th grade, no diploma

14.0%

13.4%

11.1%

High school graduate (Includes GED)

43.4%

34.4%

26.7%

Some college, no degree

21.0%

19.4%

20.3%

Associate degree

2.6%

5.0%

5.3%

Bachelor's degree

11.2%

13.7%

18.0%

Graduate or professional degree

3.5%

8.2%

13.4%

Source: 2000 Census

 

Employment and Labor Force Characteristics

 

According to the 2000 Census, Sharptown has a civilian labor force of 313 persons over the age of 16, with 9 people listed as unemployed; the unemployment rate for Sharptown is less than half of that of the County’s 3.7% unemployment rate (See Table 3-4).  Over half of Sharptown’s labor force is dedicated to one of the following employment sectors:  1) Manufacturing; 2) Retail Trade; or, 3) Education, Health, and Social Services.  Of the town’s 304 workers, 81.91% are within the private wage and salary worker class (See Table 3-5).  Both of these statistics closely mirror those of Wicomico County.

 

 

 

 

Table 34

Industry & Employment Characteristics

 

Sharptown

Percent

Wicomico Percent

Maryland Percent

Employment Status:

 

 

 

 

Population 16+ years old

489

 

66,207

4,085,942

Employed Persons

304

62.2%

63.8%

63.8%

Unemployed Persons

9

1.8%

3.7%

3.2%

Not in labor force

176

36.0%

32.3%

32.2%

 

 

 

0.2%

0.8%

Industry:

 

 

 

 

Agriculture, forestry, fisheries, mining

4

1.3%

2.2%

0.6%

Construction

28

9.2%

7.2%

6.9%

Manufacturing

51

16.8%

14.5%

7.3%

Wholesale trade

7

2.3%

3.8%

2.8%

Retail trade

61

20.1%

12.3%

10.5%

Transportation, warehousing, utilities

13

4.3%

4.3%

4.9%

Information

1

0.3%

2.6%

4.0%

Finance, insurance, real estate

20

6.6%

4.5%

7.1%

Professional, scientific, management, administrative, waste management

16

5.3%

5.8%

12.4%

Educational, health, social services

45

14.8%

24.1%

20.6%

Arts, entertainment, recreation

20

6.6%

8.6%

6.8%

Other services

21

6.9%

4.4%

5.6%

Public administration

17

5.6%

5.6%

10.5%

Source: 2000 Census

 

 

 

 

Table 35

Class of Worker

 

Sharptown

Percent

Wicomico Percent

Employed population

304

 

 

Private wage & salary workers

249

81.91%

75.7%

Government workers

41

13.49%

18.1%

Self-employed workers

14

4.61%

5.8%

Unpaid family workers

0

0.00%

0.3%

Source: 2000 Census

Commuting to Work

Text Box: Interesting Fact:

Studies show increased commuting times lead to greater transportation expenses – and less money for other necessities, such as housing and health care.

The lack of public transportation is apparent in Sharptown as no workers commuted to work via public transportation.  The vast majority of workers in Sharptown used a car, truck, or van as their means of transportation to work in 2000.  Compared against Wicomico County, Sharptown’s citizens carpooled, utilized public transportation, walked, and worked from home less.  The mean travel time to work was 26.8 minutes for Sharptown workers; 5.9 minutes longer than that of Wicomico County workers (See Table 3-6).  This travel time infers that a considerable amount of workers travel to other municipalities for employment.

 

Table 36

Commuting to Work Statistics

 

Sharptown

Percent

Wicomico Percent

Drove Alone

256

86.2%

78.8%

Carpooled

26

8.8%

12.4%

Public Transportation

0

0.0%

1.6%

Walked

3

1.0%

2.5%

Other Means

2

0.7%

1.2%

Worked At Home

10

3.4%

3.5%

 

 

 

 

Mean Travel Time to Work (Minutes)

 26.8

 

20.9

Source: 2000 Census

 

Income and Housing

 

Median household income for Sharptown was $1,165 higher than Wicomico County in 2000; however, the median family income was $2,629 less and the per capita income was $3,981 less than Wicomico County (See Figure 3-5).  The rate of persons below the poverty line in Sharptown was 8.1%, compared to 12.8% in Wicomico County.[3] 

 

Although Sharptown’s income statistics are similar to that of the County, Sharptown’s residents’ incomes are further reduced by the expenses involved with longer commutes to work in other municipalities and surrounding areas.  Sharptown’s mean travel time to work is 5.9 minutes longer than the County’s resulting in an additional 11.8 minute daily round trip travel time.  The lack of existing services and employment within Sharptown places further financial burdens on its residents.

Figure 35

 

 

Household Type

 

Sharptown had 258 households in 2000 (See Table 3-7).  This is practically no change from the 255 households reported in 1990.  Of the 258 households, 180 are family households (69.8%).  This is up 1.7% from 1990 when 177 (69.4%) were family households.  From 1990 to 2000, non-family households had no increase. 

 

The relatively minimal increase in family households and no change in non-family households are in contrast to household type trends for Wicomico County as a whole.  Family households increased 11.6% in Wicomico County from 19,513 in 1990 to 21,781 in 2000.  In addition, the number of non-family households increased 26.4% from 8,259 in 1990 to 10,437 in 2000.  Household density, or number of persons per household, closely resembles that of the County. 

 

Table 37

Household Characteristics

 

Sharptown

Wicomico County

1990

2000

% Change

1990

2000

% Change

Total Households

255

258

1.2%

27,772

32,218

16.0%

  Family Households

177

180

1.7%

19,513

21,781

11.6%

  Non-Family Households

78

78

0.0%

8,259

10,437

26.4%

Average Number of Persons Per Household

2.39

2.52

5.4%

2.56

2.53

-1.2%

Source: 2000 Census

 

Housing Occupancy

 

According to the 2000 Census, 9% of households in Sharptown are vacant.  The 2000 Census shows 77% of Sharptown’s housing units were owner-occupied, nearly 15% greater than the proportion of owner-occupied units existing in Wicomico County (See Figure 3-6).  

Figure 36

 

 


Chapter Four       Community Facilities Element

 

 


Introduction

 

Community facilities are vitally important to maintaining and increasing the public health, safety and welfare of the residents and visitors of Sharptown.  Community facilities are defined in Article 66B as parks and recreation areas, schools and other educational and cultural facilities, libraries, churches, hospitals, social welfare and medical facilities, institutions, fire stations, police stations, jails, or other public office or administrative facilities.

 

Community facilities are especially important to Sharptown because of its size and location.  Existing regional community facilities are located near larger population centers.  Moreover, Sharptown’s location is on the border of Wicomico County and Dorchester County with the Nanticoke River as the buffer between the two counties.  This places the burden on Sharptown to encourage its residents at all socioeconomic levels to use regional health, cultural and social welfare facilities, and to provide additional opportunities if possible.  It is also important that Sharptown provide adequate police and fire protection to its residents.  Lastly, Sharptown residents need adequate access to health and medical facilities.

 

This section will provide an inventory of various community facilities throughout Sharptown and the adequacy and capacity of those facilities.  Map 1, located within Appendix A, is provided indicating the location of community facilities discussed herein.  This section will also detail the state of existing community facilities and document any current deficiencies or areas where improvement is appropriate.  The goals and objectives of this section will focus on the existing conditions of those facilities and the manner in which community facilities can be used to provide increased services to the community.

 

This section will not focus on future growth or level-of-service standards for community facilities as those issues are more appropriately discussed in the Municipal Growth Element and the Water Resources Element. 

 

Inventory of Existing Community Facilities

Water Supply

 

All of the potable water supply used for industrial, commercial and residential purposes within Sharptown is secured from groundwater aquifers. The Town is almost totally dependent upon this source of water for its continuing development and prosperity.  The original water system, which began operation around 1936, consisted of a 75,000 gallon elevated water tower, a distribution system comprised of cast iron 6 and 8 inch water mains and a 300 foot well.

 

Service connections to water customers were either 3/4 or 1 inch iron pipe connected to the water main with a 24 inch lead (gooseneck) pipe. A few large service connections were used to supply customers with large water usage.

 

Potable water was supplied to the distribution system by a 12 inch, 300 foot well in the Nanticoke Aquifer. Well number 1 originally used a 15 HP turbine pump with an emergency gasoline engine as a backup in power outages. As new wells were drilled and placed into operation, well number 1 became a backup source of water. In 1990, during a water system upgrade, the turbine pump was removed, the well cleaned and a submersible pump installed. Well number 1 remains as a backup water source.  The chart below details the various wells in Town and the current use.

 

 

Table 41

Well Capacities and Parameters

 

Well No.

 

Capacity

 

Depth

 

Width

 

Pump Type

 

Status

1

132g/min.

300

12”

Submersible

Emergency Use

2

 

 

 

 

Capped

3

 

 

 

 

Capped

4

82g/min.

60

12”

Submersible

In Use

5

205g/min.

70

12”

Turbine

In Use

6

400g/min.

298

12”

Turbine

Used for Blending

 

 

 

Sharptown's water system was upgraded in 1990. The old water tower was replaced with a 200,000 gallon water tower which increased storage capacity and water reserves for fire protection. Also, static water elevation was increased to raise the Town's water pressure from 42 pounds per square inch (psi) to 52 psi.

Text Box: The Sharptown elevated water tower, shown here, was built in 1990 and has a 200,000 gallon capacity.With the exception of dead-end streets, all water mains smaller than 6 inches were removed from the distribution system and replaced with 6-inch PVC watermains, looping wherever possible to increase water circulation and eliminate most dead-end mains.  All remaining goosenecks were moved from water customer service lines.  Nine hydrants were added to the water system and since then, 19 of the original 60-year-old fire hydrants have been replaced.  The Town plans to replace one or two more every year until all remaining fire hydrants conform to national standards. 

 

Sharptown has 6.2 miles of paved streets within the corporate limits.  There are 4.85 miles of 6 and 8 inch watermains and 335 water customers to be maintained, along with water meters, fire hydrants, water tower, 4 wells and treatment facility, including related equipment.

 

The Sharptown Water Treatment Facility was built and began full operation in October 1990.  All the wells are connected to a central 10-inch water main which passes through the treatment building where chlorine gas is injected for disinfection.  Lime is also added for pH adjustment and corrosion control.  The treated water is pumped to the top of the water tower to properly blend together all wells and to achieve the necessary detention time for quality treated potable water.

 

In the future, if it is necessary to abandon the Town's shallow wells (wells number 4 and 5) due to excessive nitrate levels or other contamination, the Town water supply would rely on the Nanticoke Aquifer only. Water from this well is sufficient in quantity but not in quality. High dissolved solids and mineral content have been negative to water customers in the past. Recognizing this situation, a test well was drilled 800 feet into the Piney Point Aquifer where water analysis showed salt water infiltration, negating this attempt to secure a new quality water source.

 

Records of wells that have been drilled in other areas of Sharptown suggest alternative water sources may possibly be available for the Town's water system and should be extensively investigated before another upgrade occurs. The only drawback to this scenario is the distance of piping to the treatment facility or erecting a treatment facility at the new well location, which could be cost ineffective. Piping valves and fittings are now in place at the treatment facility if a filtering facility proved to be a cost effective alternative.

 

Providing power to the well system during emergency situations was addressed by the installation of a 100 KW generator with an automatic transfer switch.  Sharptown currently has enough water supply in reserve to accommodate future Town expansion of at least twice the current size without jeopardizing the capacity of the water system.  However, increased usage of wells 4 and 5 could result in higher nitrate concentrations over time, shortening the life of these wells without future advanced treatment or additional water supply.

 

Water meters were installed and in operation in September 1990.  The average daily water usage prior to the use of water meters was 140,000 gallons per day and has dropped to 65,000 gallons per day since.

Sewer System

 

Sharptown has a separate sanitary sewage collection system.  Despite the fact that this system was constructed about 1936, most of the vitrified clay pipe is still in relatively good shape.  There are 4.99 miles of 4 to 10 inch sewer mains, 75 known manholes, one pumping station and a 150,000 gallons per day activated sludge treatment plant.  The WWTP is equipped with a 100 KW generator on an automatic transfer switch capable of full load, continuous plant operation during emergency or power outages.

 

Originally the collection system had two separate outfall pipes directly dumping raw sewage into the Nanticoke River. During a 1972 system upgrade an interceptor sewer was constructed to divert all sewage into one collection point where it is pumped into the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). The WWTP has two extended aeration tanks, a comminutor for grinding large particles and two hopper bottom-type clarifiers for settling sludge from the treated effluent. After a 24 hour treatment in the WWTP, more than 95 percent of the organic compounds are removed from the wastewater, and the effluent is chlorinated to remove harmful bacteria, dechlorinated and then is discharged into the Nanticoke River.

 

In 1983, the entire sewage system was upgraded. A concrete chlorine contact basin was constructed to achieve a 45-minute detention time. The aeration tank blowers and pumps in the pumping station were replaced, an inflow and infiltration study was performed to correct any major problem areas and flow studies indicated about a dozen areas that required replacing sections of sewer main with PVC pipe.  Some minor sections were chemically sealed.  Manholes that had infiltration through brick walls were also chemically sealed. In 1995, all manhole lids with inflow problems had manhole cover bowls inserted to reduce rainwater inflow.

 

Tree roots are the sewer maintenance crew's largest problem for maintaining continuous sewer main flows. Over the years tree roots have entered the pipes causing joint failure and cracks. During the wet periods, when the water table rises, any sewer main below water level allows water to infiltrate the system.  The increase in flows due to inflow and infiltration during wet weather has at times increased the volume of the water in the wastewater system to twice that of the WWTP capacity.

 

The Bloch & Guggenheimer (B&G) Factory is currently the only significant industrial user connected to the collection system.  In 1989, B & G constructed a rainwater-pickle vat drainage holding lagoon.  According to the April 2006 discharge agreement, as much as 14,400 gallons per day of pre-treated wastewater may be pumped into Sharptown’s collection system.

 

The average daily residential wastewater flows were recently estimated at 90,000 gallons per day (gpd).  Simple calculations of 90,000 gpd residential, plus 120,000 gpd infiltration and 14,400 gpd from B & G Factory exceeds the daily designed flow capacity of the WWTP.  Sharptown must pursue plans to correct infiltration of the sewer mains and/or reduce the present wastewater allocation to B & G further if future development in Sharptown is considered.

Another area to consider for correcting inflow and infiltration problems is replacing older sections of sewer main which have either become too expensive to repair or were mistakenly installed improperly.  These mains must be upgraded before some sections of the Town can develop.  An updated infill and infiltration study and detailed collection is recommended to better identify deficient areas.   

 

Text Box: The Town’s wastewater treatment plant is located along the Nanticoke River on the north side of town.  The plant is 35 years old and will likely need upgrading to keep pace with new environmental restrictions.In 1990 a Sludge Management Project was produced for the WWTP. The project included an 18,000 gallon sludge holding tank, a sludge loading station and an 85 HP farm tractor for towing the Town's 1,000 gallon sludge applicator. Also a steel storage garage was constructed to house the tractor and tanker and for performing necessary repairs of equipment.

 

Sharptown currently applies its aerobically digested waste sludge to farmland as fertilizer. Due to the Town producing relatively large amounts of sludge, it is becoming increasingly more difficult to acquire permitted farmland and a property owner willing to set aside a few acres for sludge disposal. The Town should investigate the option of purchasing its own farmland for sludge management or explore the construction of a sludge drying bed where sludge could be dried and stored until a sludge field is available. Another option to explore would be a composting facility.

 

Sharptown's gravity flow collection system was designed for future capacity upgrading. Over the years, some sewer main extensions that were installed at shallow depths or with inadequate diameter pipe have hampered the connection of new homes to the collection system.  Whenever a development or new buildings are proposed, the Town should investigate optimal manhole placement, sewer main size and sewer main grade to avoid the expense of replacing sections of the collection system.

 

Other Community Facilities

Parks and Recreation

 

The following is a summary of Parks and Recreation facilities in Sharptown:

 

 

Table 42

Parks and Recreation Facilities

Recreational Facility

Area (in Acres)

Carnival Grounds

5.06

Cope Bennett Park

7.40

Gene Lowe Park

4.71

Cherry Beach Park

4.09

Main Street Park

0.21

 

Total Area:

 

21.47

 

Source:  State of  Maryland – 2006 Maryland Property View

 

The Carnival Grounds site is an important recreational facility for the Town which is owned and operated by the Town’s volunteer fire department.  The Sharptown Carnival started in 1926 and has become a growing annual event every since.  The carnival grounds with its large metal Ferris wheel and distinctive octagonal pavilions mark the southern entrance into Sharptown.

 

Main Street Park and Cherry Beach Park are maintained by the Town with the rest of the Town’s recreational facilities maintained by the County.  A plan to renovate and provide better facilities at Cherry Beach Park has been approved and will be implemented when the Town finds funds to complete the upgrades.  No other parks are scheduled for upgrade, expansion or renovation at this time.  Additional information concerning the potential to expand Cherry Beach Park and level-of-service standards for parks and recreational facilities are discussed later in the Municipal Growth Element

Educational

 

Students from Sharptown attend Northwestern Elementary School for grades Pre-K through 5 and Mardela Middle/High School for grades 6 through 12.  Both schools are located near Mardela Springs.  The County has plans to expand Mardela Middle/High School.  The Wicomico County School Board published an updated facilities plan in the summer of 2008 and is discussed in the Municipal Growth Element.  The Town should review these plans to be informed of future expansions to schools serving the area.

Libraries

 

Library service is provided by Wicomico County to all residents of the County.  No libraries are located within Sharptown.  The two main branches of the Wicomico County library are located in north Salisbury and downtown Salisbury.  The Wicomico County library provides library services directly to the residents of Sharptown using the “Bookmobile” one Saturday per month.  The “Bookmobile” also provides monthly service to nearby Mardela Springs. 

Fire Protection

 

Sharptown is served by its own volunteer fire department.  Currently, the fire department consists of 88 volunteers, 40 of which are active firefighters.  Of the 40 active firefighters, 16 are Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) and three are certified paramedics.  The Town also has one paid paramedic position staffed 20 hours a day Monday through Friday by eight part-time workers, which is funded with County assistance.   

Public Health Services

 

Currently, the Town does not have public health facilities within Town.  Residents needing public health services travel to either Salisbury, Maryland or Laurel, Delaware.  The Town’s population does not currently lend support to having public health services provided in Town.  Sharptown should consider working with other local communities, the County and surrounding municipalities to expand regional services for its residents based on projected future growth.

Police Protection

 

Wicomico County’s Sheriff’s Department responds to police calls and emergency calls.  The Town also receives regular patrols from Wicomico County and State of Maryland troopers.  Historically, Sharptown is a low-crime area and is small enough to not require having its own police force.  Sharptown also does not have funding to implement its own police force.  Sharptown will continue working with the County in making sure adequate police staffing is available for the Town.

Public Offices and Administrative Facilities

 

Sharptown’s Town Hall is located at 401 Main Street.  The Town Hall adequately houses the Town’s two administrative staff and accommodates Town meetings.  The original Town Hall building is located at 303 State Street in front of the water storage tower.  The Town currently leases that building for office use. 

Churches and Institutions

 

For its size, Sharptown has a great number of churches and social institutions within the Town limits.  Two Methodist churches have been long established within the Town.  The Town also has an American Legion post and a Masonic Temple which is being renovated.  These social and religious institutions help define the community fabric and further assist Sharptown in maintaining its close-knit rural community character.


Chapter Five            Land Use

 

 


Sharptown is a hamlet-style village consisting of mostly single-family residential homes.  From a commercial standpoint, Sharptown has few “visible” commercial facilities.  However, Sharptown is a very industrious town, where many residents run businesses directly from their homes.  The downtown area used to consist of a greater mix of commercial and residential land uses at a time when traveling to larger neighboring municipalities was difficult.  The downtown area still has some commercial land uses mixed in the historic residential community and other services to provide to the local residents, but the residents would like to foster economic development to the area; especially the development of a community grocery store and medical facilities.  The B&G Pickle Factory is the only remaining industrial site in town.  During the visioning process the Town residents did not indicate interest in additional industrial sites.

 

Goals, Objectives and Policies

 

1)      Maintain the rural character of the community;

a)      Encourage owner-occupied units and homeownership;

b)      Foster home occupations that are not adverse to the surrounding community;

c)      Use “Smart Growth” measures in subdivision, zoning and other regulatory measures.

2)      Increase and foster commercial growth to provide needed services to the community;

3)      Maintain existing parks and recreation areas;

4)      If possible, direct future growth within the current Town limits;

5)      Allow age-restricted residential retirement communities to accommodate Sharptown’s aging senior population;

6)      Create future growth areas that limit environmental impacts, as discussed in the following:

a)      Sensitive Area Element

b)      Floodplain Maps

c)      Critical Area Maps

 

Table 51

Existing Land Use Acreages and Proportions of Total Land Uses

Land Use

Area (in acres)

Percentage

Residential

150.45

54.90%