![]()
Sharptown’s Comprehensive Plan looks at potential growth within the Town through the year 2030. Infrastructure, housing, growth and many other issues are discussed within this plan. The main purpose of this plan is to properly prepare for growth and other issues that the Town will encounter over the next twenty years.
The Town would like to thank Tracey Gordy and Keith Lackie with the Maryland Department of Planning Lower Eastern Shore Regional Office for assisting the Town in finding grant funding and for providing technical assistance at no cost to the Town. The Town would also like to acknowledge Davis, Bowen & Friedel, Inc.’s planning and engineering staff for assisting in preparing the Town’s future growth plan and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for providing financial assistance for this project.
Article 66B of the Annotated Code of Maryland requires municipalities that maintain zoning authority over the jurisdiction to develop a comprehensive plan. Article 66B also requires municipalities to address specific issues within their growth plans. 2006 House Bill 1141 further requires municipalities to address the impact projected growth will have on infrastructure, water resources, schools, libraries and public safety. Sharptown’s Comprehensive Growth Plan meets the necessary requirements under Article 66B and House Bill 1141, and further addresses housing in order to be able to participate in the Workforce Housing Grant Program developed under House Bill 1160.
The information below further
discusses
The following eight “vision statements” are based on the 1992 Planning
Act, and subsequent amendments thereto, and are incorporated into this
Comprehensive Plan as fundamental goals which will be achieved through a
variety of objectives, policies, principles, recommendations, and
implementation techniques.
(1)
The
Town will concentrate development in suitable areas. Further, the Town will
coordinate its planning activities with the County to establish a mutually
agreed-upon Town Growth Boundary (TGB) to accommodate future municipal growth.
(2)
The
Town will protect its sensitive areas from the adverse effects of development
and the improper management of resource lands.
The TGB will avoid sensitive areas, or protect them as public open
space, or protect them with innovative and flexible development regulations.
(3)
The
Town will work cooperatively with the County to encourage it to protect rural
resources beyond the TGB that affect the environment, setting, character, and
economics of the Town.
(4)
The
Town will promote stewardship of the
(5)
The
Town will conserve its land, water, and other valuable resources through
programs and policies that will reduce resource consumption by both the public
and private sectors. The Town will promote efficient and pedestrian-oriented
patterns of land use, energy saving measures for residences and businesses, and
recycling.
(6)
In
order to achieve Visions One through Five, above, the Town will encourage
economic growth through the policies and recommendations of the Plan, and will
practice regulatory innovation, flexibility, and streamlining.
(7)
The
Town will make certain that adequate public facilities and infrastructure under
its control are available or planned in areas where growth is to occur.
(8)
The
Town will address funding mechanisms to achieve the preceding Visions. The Town budget, capital improvement program,
tax structure, and fees will be reviewed and revised where needed to ensure
implementation of the Plan and to promote the community’s vision for the
future. The Town will pursue appropriate
State and federal grants, forge grant partnerships with the County in areas of
mutual interest, review Town capital projects to ensure consistency with the
Plan, and encourage State and County capital projects that support the Plan.
The 1997 Priority Funding Areas Act capitalizes on the influence of
State expenditures on economic growth and development. This legislation directs
State spending to Priority Funding Areas. Priority Funding Areas are existing
communities and places where local governments want State investment to support
future growth.
Growth-related
projects covered by the legislation include most State programs that encourage
or support growth and development such as highways, sewer and water
construction, economic development assistance, and State leases or construction
of new office facilities.
The
Priority Funding Areas legislation builds on the foundation created by the
Visions that were adopted as State policy in the 1992 Economic Growth, Resource
Protection and Planning Act and are articulated above as fundamental goals for
the Town of
Sharptown’s
municipal boundary, as it existed on January 1, 1997, is considered a
pre-defined Priority Funding Area, and as such enjoys a priority for State
funding for growth-related projects. For
those lands annexed after January 1, 1997, Sharptown must seek State
concurrence of Local certification of Priority Funding Area designation. Factors considered by the State include: provision
of public water and sewer, site location within a locally designated growth
area of the adopted Comprehensive Plan, as well as permitted density by zoning
category and a supply/demand analysis.
In addition to the Priority Funding Areas Act, the 1997 General Assembly passed four other pieces of legislation and budget initiatives - Brownfields, Live Near Your Work, Job Creation Tax Credits, and Rural Legacy-known collectively as "Smart Growth."
Smart
Growth directs the State to target programs and funding to support established
communities and locally designated growth areas, and to protect rural areas.
The Priority Funding Areas Act provides a geographic focus for the State's
investment in growth-related infrastructure. The remaining four components
complement this geographic focus by targeting specific State resources to
preserve land outside of Priority Funding Areas, to encourage growth inside
Priority Funding Areas, and to ensure that existing communities continue to
provide a high quality of life for their residents.
·
Mix
land uses;
·
Take
advantage of compact building design;
·
Create
housing opportunities and choices;
·
Create
walkable communities;
·
Foster
distinctive, attractive communities with a strong sense of place;
·
Preserve
open space, farmland, natural beauty, and critical environmental areas;
·
Provide
a variety of transportation options;
·
Strengthen
and direct development to existing communities;
·
Make
development decisions predictable, fair, and cost effective; and
·
Encourage
community and stakeholder collaboration in development decisions.
Although the 1997
Smart Growth initiative was significant in the State's refusal to fund wasteful
sprawl development, it is also only one component in the continuum of
During
the 2006 Maryland Legislative Session, House Bill 1141 was enacted. This is a key planning related law having a
direct effect on procedures for annexation and requiring new planning elements
within Sharptown’s Comprehensive Plan.
There are two significant changes, with respect to annexation procedures, which affect the Town. The first change is dealing with “the five year rule” and the second change deals with “annexation plans”
There
are two changes here. First, the rule would be applied solely based upon
zoning. In the past, the five-year rule could be applied whenever a proposed
new zoning classification was substantially different from the use envisioned
"in the current and duly adopted master plan." The reference to the
master plan is now gone and the issue becomes the degree of change from the
current county zoning classification to the proposed municipal classification
following the annexation. When the zoning change is from one residential zone
to another," substantially different" now is defined as a density
change. The five-year rule will not kick in for a density change unless the
proposed zoning is 50% denser. For example, if the current zoning permits 1
unit per acre, the new zoning can be subject to the five year rule if it
permits anything more than 1.5 units per acre. As before, a municipality may
obtain a waiver from the county to avoid the five-year wait until the new
zoning classification applies. This
change took effect on October 1, 2006.
An
annexation plan is required that replaces the "outline" for the
extension of services and public facilities prior to the public hearing for an
annexation proposal. This section contains no additional language for the
content of the annexation plan to be adopted, but does require it to be
consistent with the municipal growth element for any annexations that begin
after October 1, 2009 (unless extended for up to two six-month periods). The
Plan must be provided to the county and the State (the Maryland Department of
Planning) at least 30 days prior to the hearing. The requirement for an
annexation plan and the requirement that it be provided to the Maryland
Department of Planning took effect on October 1, 2006. The requirement for
consistency with the Municipal Growth Element of the comprehensive plan takes
effect no later than October 1, 2009.
The
new legislation mentioned above requires two new elements (i.e., chapters) of
local comprehensive plans. The first element, the Water Resources Plan Element
- is required of all local governments (county and municipal) that exercise
planning and zoning authority. The second element, the Municipal Growth Element
- is required in municipal comprehensive plans only. Both elements are required
to be incorporated into the Town’s Comprehensive Plan not later than October 1,
2009 (unless extended for up to two six-month periods).
This
new planning element addresses the relationship of planned growth to water
resources for both waste disposal and safe drinking water. It will be required
of all county and municipal governments in the State. The element must identify
drinking water and other water resources adequate for the needs of existing and
future development proposed in the land use element of the comprehensive plan.
It must also identify suitable receiving waters for both wastewater and storm
water management to meet the needs of existing and projected development
proposed in the land use element of the comprehensive plan. The Maryland Department
of the Environment will provide available data to identify these resources.
Resource issues expected to be addressed in these elements include water
resource protection areas, groundwater resources, water quality standards and
Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs).
This
element requires a municipality to identify areas for future growth consistent
with a long-range vision for its future. The growth element will be developed
based on consideration of a comprehensive list of factors including population
projections, an assessment of land capacity and needs and an assessment of
infrastructure and sensitive areas. Completion of the element will guide future
annexation proposals and plans after October 2009. Consultation with
THIS PAGE WAS LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Sharptown is an incorporated community of
approximately 680 residents[*].
It lies in the northwestern tip of
When
By the very early 1800's however, it was known as
Sharptown. Speculation has it that the
village was named after Governor Horatio Sharpe, proprietary Governor of
Maryland from 1753 to 1769. Although the
Governor never seemed to mention this honor in his personal letters or papers,
he was in that area in June 1761 to observe the work of a group of surveyors
involved in the preliminary
Three years after the Governor's visit, the famous
surveying team of Charles Mason and Jeremiah Dixon crossed the
Gravestones from the 1700's bear names of many
families still living in the town - Bennett, Phillips, Elzey, Robinson,
Gravenor, Dashiell and Collins. Around 1818, the Matthew Marine family settled
there. Matthew Marine's ancestors had
been among
family settled there.
Matthew Marine's ancestors had been among
Figure 2‑1 Location Map


proved to be more than a navigable river to use for transportation; it was the basis for an industry that would carry the town's name across the oceans.
As the founder of the Sharptown Marine Railway,
Marine owned the largest fleet of schooners of any one person on the
His son, the Rev. Fletcher Marine, was in business
with his father for a while, but later moved to
Some of the better known ships built by the railway
between 1865 and 1893 included the “Martha Ellen”, the “Nettie R. Evans”, the
“James H. Hargrave” and the “John W. Elliott”.
At the turn of the century, 18 sailing vessels registered as

The
first steamboat to come by Sharptown on the way to Seaford was the “Osiris” in
1854, followed by the
In the early part of the 1800's, the prosperity in
the Town attracted many new settlers. By
1845, there were enough residents to warrant the establishment of a post
office. Nine years later,
Religion has always played an important part in the
lives of the town's people. A Methodist
Episcopal church had been built outside of the town in 1832, but in those days
it was just too far to travel. Instead
the Methodist Protestant church in nearby
During the Civil War, there was little enthusiasm for
either the North or South in Sharptown.
Although a Union regiment was formed, based in
By 1877, the town could boast of four dry goods stores owned by John Smith, Thomas J. Twilley, J.R. Twilley, and S. T. Cooper. There was also a basket company located in Sharptown at this time which had been established by John Robinson and his brother. They manufactured grape and peach baskets, desk plugs, trunnel wedges, wood and iron turning, and fruit crates and baskets. There was a blacksmith/shipsmith shop (owned by Edward Burford), two ship carpenter/smith shops (owned by John W. Robinson and W.I.J. Phillips), and a ship carpenter/sail maker, C. J. Gravenor. Wesley Clarkson owned a thriving business in groceries and whiskey by the wharf. The Sharptown Marine Railway Company was in operation, now owned by R. M. Elzey and Brothers. Dr. Joseph Mann cured the town's ills. Joshua P. Bennett and Richard Darby served as Justices of the Peace in the district, while James F. Marine was Officer of Registration for elections.
The Town was first incorporated in 1874 but that was repealed in 1880, only to be incorporated again eight years later (1888) in a manner identical to that of the Act of 1874. An unusual feature of that Act was that it allowed Town Commissioners to alter town boundaries. The entire charter was again repealed and reenacted in 1912.
For
several years after World War I, business declined due to the loss of the
railway. Robinson sold his growing
basket-making business to Marvel Package Company and with that as the main
employer, the Town provided jobs for approximately 200 of its own
residents. The population was maintained
at 600 to 700 for most of the years after 1920.
Marvel Package Company later sold to Atlas Plywood Company. After the factory was destroyed by fire in
1953, they decided not to rebuild it and Sharptown's bustling business days
came to an end.
To present day, the character of Sharptown
has not changed much from its shipbuilding and industrial days. With the exception of a national concern over
removing toxic chemicals from an old oil company site, Sharptown has flown under
the radar for the past 50 years.
In order to develop a vision for the Town’s future, direct input from residents and businesses of the Town was sought out. In Fall 2007, the President and Town Commissioners and the Planning Commission met separately to discuss whether the previous vision, goals and objectives listed in the 1996 Comprehensive Plan were still valid and discussed changes to the vision, goals and objectives that should be added in this update.
Later in Fall 2007, the Town conducted a Comprehensive Planning workshop. All of the residents and businesses in Sharptown were invited to participate in the input and visioning process. All members in attendance were informed of the comprehensive planning process and the State guidelines for developing a comprehensive plan. The larger group was separated into smaller “breakout” groups and asked to brainstorm about various issues, including future growth, the character of the community and services provided to the Town. The groups input was compiled and used to further develop the vision for this Plan.
The Town further sought out alternative methods of gaining community input throughout this planning process. Anonymous surveys and comment forms were distributed door-to-door to members of the community. Surveys and discussion boards were also made available via an internet website in order to gain a greater response from a larger sample area. Survey results and questionnaires were analyzed and incorporated into the vision for the Town.
The individual plan elements in draft form were provided at Town Hall and on the internet for review and comment by Town residents. Two public hearings were held, by the Planning Commission and Town Council, where additional feedback was provided. All comments were incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan where applicable.[†]
Town residents were provided a survey door-to-door and on the internet. The survey asked residents to respond to a number of questions, including their satisfaction with Town facilities and their feelings about expanding Town boundaries to coordinate growth. Out of the nearly 300 households and 680 residents, the Town received an 18% and 7.5% rate of response, respectively.

After
receiving input from the community, as described above, and reviewing the
Town’s vision for the future as stated in the 1996 Comprehensive Plan, the
character and vision for the community remains virtually unchanged. Sharptown would like to remain a small, tight-knit,
“bedroom” community. The Town prides
itself on remaining a personable residential community and maintaining the
character of the Town while recognizing and managing inevitable future growth.
The residents of Sharptown realize their community is growing slowly but will continue to grow. The Town understands young families need to be welcomed into Sharptown as residents and neighbors to the existing community in order to maintain the Town’s vitality. Residents also recognize it has a strong and growing retirement population that is fundamental to the fabric of the community. In order to keep the close community together as times change, it is important to the residents of Sharptown that its borders remain small and the community does not expand to the point where the Town loses its character mainstay.
The future of the Town must
maintain and carry on the story of its historical roots. Residents and businesses recognize the rich
history and historical resources of the Town.
Sharptown must also create a business environment that allows for the development of additional services within Town so residents do not have to travel long distances for essential needs (e.g., food, medical care, senior services). The Town further notes any business expansion must be sustainable – meaning it will need to be in scale and character to be supported economically by the residents and businesses in Sharptown. Moreover, business development that is incompatible with the Main Street Community should be developed along the highway corridor in order to maintain the historic areas.
The Town has the luxury of many
different parks of varying sizes and the use of the
Residents also realize that
Sharptown is a small part of a much larger community on the
In closing, the vision for the community is simple: maintain the character and quality of life in the community, provide services to the Town’s residents and create an environment that allows for controlled growth while introducing new families into the fabric of Sharptown.
The following goals and objectives are guided by the State’s eight visions and the community’s visioning and participation.
Sharptown is a beautiful hamlet
community in
Implementation and funding is important to make sure this plan is more than just a plan, but a mechanism for guiding the future of the Town. The policies that are drawn from this plan are as equally important as the future vision for the Town and the goals and objectives discussed herein. A Comprehensive Plan is a living, breathing document. The Town should revisit the plan from time-to-time to see which goals have been met, where shortfalls remain and to address the new goals of the community.
THIS PAGE WAS LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
![]()
The Town of
Figure 3‑1

Source: MD Office of Planning, Planning Data
Services & 2000 Census
The 2000 Census population of
Sharptown is 649 persons, 40 persons (6.6%) above the 1990 Census count of
609. Prior to 1990 there was a 51 person
(7.7%) decrease in population since 1970.
Note that Sharptown conforms to the trend of increasing population among
Sharptown accounts for a small
portion of
|
Table 3‑1 |
||||||
|
Total Population |
||||||
|
Place |
1950 |
1960 |
1970 |
1980 |
1990 |
2000 |
|
Delmar |
1,328 |
1,291 |
1,191 |
1,232 |
1,430 |
1,859 |
|
Fruitland |
1,028 |
1,147 |
2,315 |
2,694 |
3,511 |
3,774 |
|
|
723 |
754 |
705 |
714 |
665 |
807 |
|
Mardela Springs |
428 |
380 |
356 |
320 |
360 |
364 |
|
Pittsville |
497 |
488 |
477 |
519 |
602 |
1,182 |
|
|
15,141 |
16,302 |
15,252 |
16,429 |
20,592 |
23,743 |
|
Sharptown |
680 |
620 |
660 |
654 |
609 |
649 |
|
Willards |
464 |
531 |
494 |
540 |
708 |
938 |
|
|
39,641 |
49,641 |
54,236 |
64,540 |
74,339 |
84,644 |
|
State of |
2.3 M |
3.1 M |
3.92 M |
4.22 M |
4.78 M |
5.29 M |
|
Source: MD Office of
Planning, Planning Data Services & 2000 Census |
||||||

The
age structure and total population trends are important components of future
land use designations for Sharptown’s future needs. Programmers of policies for community
facilities, such as schools or services, and providing transportation for
persons with limited mobility, rely on age composition data. In addition, key indicators of relative well
being, such as employment and housing, are also dependent upon the age structure
of the population (See Table 3-2). In comparison to the State, the County, and
other municipalities in
Figure 3‑2

|
Table 3‑2 |
|||||||
|
Age Cohort by Municipality |
|||||||
|
City/Town |
<5 |
5-17 |
18-24 |
25-44 |
45-64 |
65+ |
Median Age |
|
Delmar (1,859) |
8.4% |
23.1% |
9.8% |
30.1% |
18.6% |
10.0% |
31.7 |
|
Fruitland (3,774) |
7.4% |
20.8% |
9.4% |
30.0% |
20.5% |
11.9% |
34.3 |
|
|
7.1% |
23.4% |
8.4% |
30.4% |
20.1% |
10.7% |
32.2 |
|
Mardela Springs (364) |
6.3% |
22.8% |
8.2% |
30.2% |
20.6% |
11.8% |
34.3 |
|
Pittsville (1,182) |
8.6% |
18.2% |
9.6% |
34.1% |
20.5% |
9.0% |
32.2 |
|
|
6.2% |
15.6% |
21.8% |
26.9% |
17.0% |
12.5% |
29.4 |
|
Sharptown (649) |
4.9% |
20.4% |
5.2% |
31.1% |
21.9% |
16.5% |
37.9 |
|
Willards (938) |
8.6% |
20.4% |
9.4% |
32.0% |
17.5% |
12.2% |
32.4 |
|
|
6.3% |
18.5% |
11.8% |
28.0% |
22.6% |
12.8% |
35.8 |
|
State of |
6.7% |
18.9% |
8.5% |
31.4% |
23.1% |
11.3% |
36.0 |
|
Source: 2000 Census |
|||||||
The ratio of persons in the 25 to
44 year old age group for Sharptown is 31.1%, higher than
The median age of Sharptown is
higher than all other municipalities in


The 45 to 64 year old group
comprises 21.9% of the total population in Sharptown. While this is the highest share for this age
group of any other municipality in
Persons 65 years old and over
comprise 16.5% of Sharptown’s population, compared to 12.8% for the County and
11.3% for the State. In other
municipalities, this age group ranges from 9.0% in Pittsville to 12.2% in Willards. When this age group is coupled with the
grouping of persons 45 to 64 years, persons 45 years and older accounted for
38.4% of Sharptown’s population. In
In the 2000 Census, Sharptown’s
population was 46.8% male and 53.2% female.
This closely mirrors the gender characteristics of
Figure 3‑3
![]()

Figure 3‑4

The majority of Sharptown’s
persons 3 years and older are enrolled in elementary schools (grades 1-8) which
are generally 6 to 14 year old children.
The proportion of elementary age children is considerably higher than
that of
|
Table 3‑3 |
|||
|
Educational Statistics |
|||
|
|
Sharptown |
Wicomico |
|
|
Persons 3 years or older enrolled in
school |
175 |
24,554 |
1,475,484 |
|
Nursery school, preschool |
1.7% |
5.4% |
6.5% |
|
Kindergarten |
5.1% |
4.3% |
5.1% |
|
Elementary school (grades 1-8) |
66.3% |
41.0% |
43.5% |
|
High school (grades 9-12) |
18.3% |
19.8% |
20.9% |
|
College or graduate school |
8.6% |
29.5% |
24.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Educational Attainment: Persons 25 years and
over |
429 |
53,521 |
3,495,595 |
|
Less than 9th grade |
4.4% |
6.0% |
5.1% |
|
9th-12th grade, no diploma |
14.0% |
13.4% |
11.1% |
|
High school graduate (Includes GED) |
43.4% |
34.4% |
26.7% |
|
Some college, no degree |
21.0% |
19.4% |
20.3% |
|
Associate degree |
2.6% |
5.0% |
5.3% |
|
Bachelor's degree |
11.2% |
13.7% |
18.0% |
|
Graduate or professional degree |
3.5% |
8.2% |
13.4% |
|
Source: 2000 Census |
|||
According to the 2000 Census,
Sharptown has a civilian labor force of 313 persons over the age of 16, with 9
people listed as unemployed; the unemployment rate for Sharptown is less than
half of that of the County’s 3.7% unemployment rate (See Table 3-4). Over half of Sharptown’s labor force is
dedicated to one of the following employment sectors: 1) Manufacturing; 2) Retail Trade; or, 3)
Education, Health, and Social Services.
Of the town’s 304 workers, 81.91% are within the private wage and salary
worker class (See Table 3-5). Both of
these statistics closely mirror those of
|
Table 3‑4 |
|||||
|
Industry & Employment Characteristics |
|||||
|
|
Sharptown |
Percent |
Wicomico Percent |
|
|
|
Employment
Status: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Population 16+
years old |
489 |
|
66,207 |
4,085,942 |
|
|
Employed Persons |
304 |
62.2% |
63.8% |
63.8% |
|
|
Unemployed
Persons |
9 |
1.8% |
3.7% |
3.2% |
|
|
Not in labor
force |
176 |
36.0% |
32.3% |
32.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
0.2% |
0.8% |
|
|
Industry: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agriculture,
forestry, fisheries, mining |
4 |
1.3% |
2.2% |
0.6% |
|
|
Construction |
28 |
9.2% |
7.2% |
6.9% |
|
|
Manufacturing |
51 |
16.8% |
14.5% |
7.3% |
|
|
Wholesale trade |
7 |
2.3% |
3.8% |
2.8% |
|
|
Retail trade |
61 |
20.1% |
12.3% |
10.5% |
|
|
Transportation,
warehousing, utilities |
13 |
4.3% |
4.3% |
4.9% |
|
|
Information |
1 |
0.3% |
2.6% |
4.0% |
|
|
Finance,
insurance, real estate |
20 |
6.6% |
4.5% |
7.1% |
|
|
Professional,
scientific, management, administrative, waste management |
16 |
5.3% |
5.8% |
12.4% |
|
|
Educational,
health, social services |
45 |
14.8% |
24.1% |
20.6% |
|
|
Arts,
entertainment, recreation |
20 |
6.6% |
8.6% |
6.8% |
|
|
Other services |
21 |
6.9% |
4.4% |
5.6% |
|
|
Public
administration |
17 |
5.6% |
5.6% |
10.5% |
|
|
Source: 2000 Census |
|||||
|
Table 3‑5 |
||||
|
Class of Worker |
||||
|
|
Sharptown |
Percent |
Wicomico Percent |
|
|
Employed population |
304 |
|
|
|
|
Private wage & salary workers |
249 |
81.91% |
75.7% |
|
|
Government workers |
41 |
13.49% |
18.1% |
|
|
Self-employed workers |
14 |
4.61% |
5.8% |
|
|
Unpaid family workers |
0 |
0.00% |
0.3% |
|
|
Source: 2000 Census |
||||


The lack of public transportation
is apparent in Sharptown as no workers commuted to work via public
transportation. The vast majority of
workers in Sharptown used a car, truck, or van as their means of transportation
to work in 2000. Compared against
|
Table 3‑6 |
||||
|
Commuting to Work Statistics |
||||
|
|
Sharptown |
Percent |
Wicomico Percent |
|
|
Drove Alone |
256 |
86.2% |
78.8% |
|
|
Carpooled |
26 |
8.8% |
12.4% |
|
|
Public Transportation |
0 |
0.0% |
1.6% |
|
|
Walked |
3 |
1.0% |
2.5% |
|
|
Other Means |
2 |
0.7% |
1.2% |
|
|
Worked At Home |
10 |
3.4% |
3.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean Travel Time to Work (Minutes) |
26.8 |
|
20.9 |
|
|
Source: 2000 Census |
||||
Median household income for
Sharptown was $1,165 higher than
Although Sharptown’s income statistics are similar to that of the County, Sharptown’s residents’ incomes are further reduced by the expenses involved with longer commutes to work in other municipalities and surrounding areas. Sharptown’s mean travel time to work is 5.9 minutes longer than the County’s resulting in an additional 11.8 minute daily round trip travel time. The lack of existing services and employment within Sharptown places further financial burdens on its residents.
Figure 3‑5

Sharptown had 258 households in 2000 (See Table 3-7). This is practically no change from the 255 households reported in 1990. Of the 258 households, 180 are family households (69.8%). This is up 1.7% from 1990 when 177 (69.4%) were family households. From 1990 to 2000, non-family households had no increase.
The relatively minimal increase
in family households and no change in non-family households are in contrast to
household type trends for
|
Household Characteristics |
||||||
|
|
Sharptown |
|
||||
|
1990 |
2000 |
% Change |
1990 |
2000 |
% Change |
|
|
Total Households |
255 |
258 |
1.2% |
27,772 |
32,218 |
16.0% |
|
Family Households |
177 |
180 |
1.7% |
19,513 |
21,781 |
11.6% |
|
Non-Family Households |
78 |
78 |
0.0% |
8,259 |
10,437 |
26.4% |
|
Average Number of
Persons Per Household |
2.39 |
2.52 |
5.4% |
2.56 |
2.53 |
-1.2% |
|
Source: 2000 Census |
||||||
According to the 2000 Census, 9%
of households in Sharptown are vacant.
The 2000 Census shows 77% of Sharptown’s housing units were
owner-occupied, nearly 15% greater than the proportion of owner-occupied units
existing in
Figure 3‑6

![]()
Community facilities are vitally important to maintaining and increasing the public health, safety and welfare of the residents and visitors of Sharptown. Community facilities are defined in Article 66B as parks and recreation areas, schools and other educational and cultural facilities, libraries, churches, hospitals, social welfare and medical facilities, institutions, fire stations, police stations, jails, or other public office or administrative facilities.
Community facilities are
especially important to Sharptown because of its size and location. Existing regional community facilities are
located near larger population centers.
Moreover, Sharptown’s location is on the border of
This section will provide an inventory of various community facilities throughout Sharptown and the adequacy and capacity of those facilities. Map 1, located within Appendix A, is provided indicating the location of community facilities discussed herein. This section will also detail the state of existing community facilities and document any current deficiencies or areas where improvement is appropriate. The goals and objectives of this section will focus on the existing conditions of those facilities and the manner in which community facilities can be used to provide increased services to the community.
This section will not focus on future growth or level-of-service standards for community facilities as those issues are more appropriately discussed in the Municipal Growth Element and the Water Resources Element.
All of the potable water supply used for industrial, commercial and residential purposes within Sharptown is secured from groundwater aquifers. The Town is almost totally dependent upon this source of water for its continuing development and prosperity. The original water system, which began operation around 1936, consisted of a 75,000 gallon elevated water tower, a distribution system comprised of cast iron 6 and 8 inch water mains and a 300 foot well.
Service connections to water customers were either 3/4 or 1 inch iron pipe connected to the water main with a 24 inch lead (gooseneck) pipe. A few large service connections were used to supply customers with large water usage.
Potable water was supplied to the distribution system by a 12 inch, 300 foot well in the Nanticoke Aquifer. Well number 1 originally used a 15 HP turbine pump with an emergency gasoline engine as a backup in power outages. As new wells were drilled and placed into operation, well number 1 became a backup source of water. In 1990, during a water system upgrade, the turbine pump was removed, the well cleaned and a submersible pump installed. Well number 1 remains as a backup water source. The chart below details the various wells in Town and the current use.
|
Table 4‑1 Well Capacities and Parameters |
|||||
|
Well No. |
Capacity |
Depth |
Width |
Pump Type |
Status |
|
1 |
132g/min. |
300 |
12” |
Submersible |
Emergency Use |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
Capped |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
Capped |
|
4 |
82g/min. |
60 |
12” |
Submersible |
In Use |
|
5 |
205g/min. |
70 |
12” |
Turbine |
In Use |
|
6 |
400g/min. |
298 |
12” |
Turbine |
Used for Blending |
Sharptown's
water system was upgraded in 1990. The old water tower was replaced with a
200,000 gallon water tower which increased storage capacity and water reserves
for fire protection. Also, static water elevation was increased to raise the
Town's water pressure from 42 pounds per square inch (psi) to 52 psi.
With the exception of dead-end streets, all
water mains smaller than 6 inches were removed from the distribution system and
replaced with 6-inch PVC watermains, looping wherever possible to increase
water circulation and eliminate most dead-end mains. All remaining goosenecks were moved from
water customer service lines. Nine
hydrants were added to the water system and since then, 19 of the original
60-year-old fire hydrants have been replaced.
The Town plans to replace one or two more every year until all remaining
fire hydrants conform to national standards.
Sharptown has 6.2 miles of paved streets within the corporate limits. There are 4.85 miles of 6 and 8 inch watermains and 335 water customers to be maintained, along with water meters, fire hydrants, water tower, 4 wells and treatment facility, including related equipment.
The Sharptown Water Treatment Facility was built and began full operation in October 1990. All the wells are connected to a central 10-inch water main which passes through the treatment building where chlorine gas is injected for disinfection. Lime is also added for pH adjustment and corrosion control. The treated water is pumped to the top of the water tower to properly blend together all wells and to achieve the necessary detention time for quality treated potable water.
In the future, if it is necessary to abandon the Town's shallow wells (wells number 4 and 5) due to excessive nitrate levels or other contamination, the Town water supply would rely on the Nanticoke Aquifer only. Water from this well is sufficient in quantity but not in quality. High dissolved solids and mineral content have been negative to water customers in the past. Recognizing this situation, a test well was drilled 800 feet into the Piney Point Aquifer where water analysis showed salt water infiltration, negating this attempt to secure a new quality water source.
Records of wells that have been drilled in other areas of Sharptown suggest alternative water sources may possibly be available for the Town's water system and should be extensively investigated before another upgrade occurs. The only drawback to this scenario is the distance of piping to the treatment facility or erecting a treatment facility at the new well location, which could be cost ineffective. Piping valves and fittings are now in place at the treatment facility if a filtering facility proved to be a cost effective alternative.
Providing power to the well system during emergency situations was addressed by the installation of a 100 KW generator with an automatic transfer switch. Sharptown currently has enough water supply in reserve to accommodate future Town expansion of at least twice the current size without jeopardizing the capacity of the water system. However, increased usage of wells 4 and 5 could result in higher nitrate concentrations over time, shortening the life of these wells without future advanced treatment or additional water supply.
Water meters were installed and in operation in September 1990. The average daily water usage prior to the use of water meters was 140,000 gallons per day and has dropped to 65,000 gallons per day since.
Sharptown has a separate sanitary sewage collection system. Despite the fact that this system was constructed about 1936, most of the vitrified clay pipe is still in relatively good shape. There are 4.99 miles of 4 to 10 inch sewer mains, 75 known manholes, one pumping station and a 150,000 gallons per day activated sludge treatment plant. The WWTP is equipped with a 100 KW generator on an automatic transfer switch capable of full load, continuous plant operation during emergency or power outages.
Originally the collection system had two separate
outfall pipes directly dumping raw sewage into the
In 1983, the entire sewage system was upgraded. A concrete chlorine contact basin was constructed to achieve a 45-minute detention time. The aeration tank blowers and pumps in the pumping station were replaced, an inflow and infiltration study was performed to correct any major problem areas and flow studies indicated about a dozen areas that required replacing sections of sewer main with PVC pipe. Some minor sections were chemically sealed. Manholes that had infiltration through brick walls were also chemically sealed. In 1995, all manhole lids with inflow problems had manhole cover bowls inserted to reduce rainwater inflow.
Tree roots are the sewer maintenance crew's largest problem for maintaining continuous sewer main flows. Over the years tree roots have entered the pipes causing joint failure and cracks. During the wet periods, when the water table rises, any sewer main below water level allows water to infiltrate the system. The increase in flows due to inflow and infiltration during wet weather has at times increased the volume of the water in the wastewater system to twice that of the WWTP capacity.
The Bloch & Guggenheimer (B&G) Factory is currently the only significant industrial user connected to the collection system. In 1989, B & G constructed a rainwater-pickle vat drainage holding lagoon. According to the April 2006 discharge agreement, as much as 14,400 gallons per day of pre-treated wastewater may be pumped into Sharptown’s collection system.
The average daily residential wastewater flows were recently estimated at 90,000 gallons per day (gpd). Simple calculations of 90,000 gpd residential, plus 120,000 gpd infiltration and 14,400 gpd from B & G Factory exceeds the daily designed flow capacity of the WWTP. Sharptown must pursue plans to correct infiltration of the sewer mains and/or reduce the present wastewater allocation to B & G further if future development in Sharptown is considered.

Another area to consider for correcting inflow and infiltration problems is replacing older sections of sewer main which have either become too expensive to repair or were mistakenly installed improperly. These mains must be upgraded before some sections of the Town can develop. An updated infill and infiltration study and detailed collection is recommended to better identify deficient areas.
In 1990 a Sludge Management Project was
produced for the WWTP. The project included an 18,000 gallon sludge holding
tank, a sludge loading station and an 85 HP farm tractor for towing the Town's
1,000 gallon sludge applicator. Also a steel storage garage was constructed to
house the tractor and tanker and for performing necessary repairs of equipment.
Sharptown currently applies its aerobically digested waste sludge to farmland as fertilizer. Due to the Town producing relatively large amounts of sludge, it is becoming increasingly more difficult to acquire permitted farmland and a property owner willing to set aside a few acres for sludge disposal. The Town should investigate the option of purchasing its own farmland for sludge management or explore the construction of a sludge drying bed where sludge could be dried and stored until a sludge field is available. Another option to explore would be a composting facility.
Sharptown's gravity flow collection system was designed for future capacity upgrading. Over the years, some sewer main extensions that were installed at shallow depths or with inadequate diameter pipe have hampered the connection of new homes to the collection system. Whenever a development or new buildings are proposed, the Town should investigate optimal manhole placement, sewer main size and sewer main grade to avoid the expense of replacing sections of the collection system.
The following is a summary of Parks and Recreation facilities in Sharptown:
|
Table 4‑2 Parks and Recreation Facilities |
|
|
Recreational Facility |
Area (in Acres) |
|
Carnival Grounds |
5.06 |
|
Cope Bennett Park |
7.40 |
|
|
4.71 |
|
|
4.09 |
|
|
0.21 |
|
Total Area: |
21.47 |
|
Source: State
of |
|
The Carnival Grounds site is an important recreational facility for the Town which is owned and operated by the Town’s volunteer fire department. The Sharptown Carnival started in 1926 and has become a growing annual event every since. The carnival grounds with its large metal Ferris wheel and distinctive octagonal pavilions mark the southern entrance into Sharptown.
Students from Sharptown attend
Library service is provided by
Sharptown is served by its own volunteer fire department. Currently, the fire department consists of 88 volunteers, 40 of which are active firefighters. Of the 40 active firefighters, 16 are Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) and three are certified paramedics. The Town also has one paid paramedic position staffed 20 hours a day Monday through Friday by eight part-time workers, which is funded with County assistance.
Currently, the Town does not have public health
facilities within Town. Residents needing
public health services travel to either
Sharptown’s Town Hall is located at
For its size, Sharptown has a
great number of churches and social institutions within the Town limits. Two Methodist churches have been long
established within the Town. The Town
also has an American Legion post and a
![]()
Sharptown is a hamlet-style village consisting of mostly single-family residential homes. From a commercial standpoint, Sharptown has few “visible” commercial facilities. However, Sharptown is a very industrious town, where many residents run businesses directly from their homes. The downtown area used to consist of a greater mix of commercial and residential land uses at a time when traveling to larger neighboring municipalities was difficult. The downtown area still has some commercial land uses mixed in the historic residential community and other services to provide to the local residents, but the residents would like to foster economic development to the area; especially the development of a community grocery store and medical facilities. The B&G Pickle Factory is the only remaining industrial site in town. During the visioning process the Town residents did not indicate interest in additional industrial sites.
1) Maintain the rural character of the community;
a) Encourage owner-occupied units and homeownership;
b) Foster home occupations that are not adverse to the surrounding community;
c) Use “Smart Growth” measures in subdivision, zoning and other regulatory measures.
2) Increase and foster commercial growth to provide needed services to the community;
3) Maintain existing parks and recreation areas;
4) If possible, direct future growth within the current Town limits;
5) Allow age-restricted residential retirement communities to accommodate Sharptown’s aging senior population;
6) Create future growth areas that limit environmental impacts, as discussed in the following:
a) Sensitive Area Element
b) Floodplain Maps
c) Critical Area Maps
|
Table 5‑1 |
||
|
Existing Land Use Acreages and Proportions
of |
||
|
Land Use |
Area (in acres) |
Percentage |
|
Residential |
150.45 |
54.90% |